|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Continued from page 10) Of the 18 organizations
that received RW funding, 10 noted that they had representatives on their
local Planning Council (PC) Board or committees. Two agencies had representatives
on their PC Board but did not get RW Title One funds while five respondents
reported no RW funding at all but representatives on their local PC’s Board
or committees. A few agencies that received RW funding did not feel it
necessary to be involved with their local PC because they did not receive
RW Title I funds. Some RDs reach out to ministries active in HIV/AIDS support
and try to work with agencies having RW money to improve how they are disseminating
grant funds.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As patient numbers continue to grow and with limited funds available, it seems prudent for clinicians to identify program funding sources. Knowing the sources of program funding should prompt clinicians to be more aggressive in fighting to keep current funding and in seeking future funding streams. Taking into consideration the current trend to decrease government funding of programs such as RW, the rationing of care will be necessary and this might produce differences in both funding and clinical care in the future. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
PO Box 39385 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33339-9385 USA |
|
Any use of the information presented herein is done strictly at your own risk. No responsibility is implied or intended on the part of HIV ReSources Inc, the editor, or the publisher. Information on this site should not be construed as an endorsement of any kind. |
|
|